13th United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and World Benchmarking Alliance

The session will focus on stakeholder engagement in the implementation of the UNGPs by companies. Effective engagement is critical for companies to understand the human rights impacts they cause or contribute to and to develop meaningful responses. The discussion will underscore the importance of engaging not only internal stakeholders but also external communities, supply chain workers, and other rightsholders who are often directly impacted by corporate activities. While progress has been made, many companies still struggle to ensure this engagement is equitable, transparent, and effective. Drawing on five years of CHRB trends and WBA's Social Benchmark the session will showcase good practices as well as ongoing challenges. It will explore how companies can foster meaningful engagement that builds trust and comprehensively addresses human rights concerns. Speakers will also examine the role of investors, civil society, and business platforms in driving improved corporate human rights performance, especially in light of growing regulatory requirements.

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business, the European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the UN (HEUNI) and Coretta & Martin Luther King Institute for Peace 

This snapshot session focuses on migrant workers’ access to effective remedy in Europe, more specifically in the Nordic countries and the Baltic Sea region, discussing if and how migrant workers, who have been exploited at work, have access to effective remedy for the harm they have suffered. Migrant workers may face structural and practical barriers in accessing remedy, including lack of information about grievance mechanisms and rights, and lack of access to legal aid or other support. Well-functioning grievance mechanisms that allow for access to effective remedy may also not exist. Based on recent research findings, this session highlights the gaps in migrant workers’ access to effective remedy and discusses how to engage with key stakeholders to address these barriers in local remedy ecosystems. It presents concrete examples of stakeholder engagement that have facilitated access to effective remedy.
Key objectives:

• Address challenges and practical barriers migrant workers face in accessing remedy in the Nordic countries and the Baltic Sea region.
• Discuss how stakeholders can work together to tighten gaps along different levels of the supply chains to improve access to effective remedy.
• Emphasize the role of civil society actors in conjunction with all the other actors involved in the abuse-remedy cycle.
• Address what is needed to move a smart mix of measures from theory to practice to achieve better outcomes.
• Showcase good examples to improve migrant workers’ access to effective remedy in the Nordic countries and the Baltic Sea region based on recent research.

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights, ECLT Foundation and Better Cotton 

Summary 
In the agricultural sector, farmers and workers, including children face systemic human rights challenges. In response, companies, governments and multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) are collaborating to develop and implement a smart mix of measures to address them.
In this session, the ECLT Foundation and Better Cotton will share their insights as MSIs involved in developing and implementing a smart mix of measures in agriculture across various contexts and geographies.

Objectives of the session

• Explore the roles that companies, governments, and civil society can play in addressing the root causes of human rights challenges for a meaningful, sustainable change.
• Assess the landscape for collaboration among MSIs aiming to advance human rights due diligence in agriculture.

About ECLT
The ECLT Foundation works towards agriculture free of all forms of child labour: a world with thriving agricultural communities where children go to school and develop in a safe environment. Our belief is that fostering capacities and establishing enduring partnerships is the most effective approach to tackle the underlying causes of child labour.
To provide a solid foundation for our discussion, we'll be referring to a set of background documents that examine the role of multi-stakeholder initiatives in protecting human rights in agriculture.
ECLT Board Members’ Pledge of Commitment, an agreement to uphold robust policy on child labour, conduct due diligence and provide for remediation consistent with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
Baseline and follow up reports on status and progress of Pledge signatories with respect to child rights due diligence in their supply chains.
Agriculture Labour Practices Code from Zimbabwe, which defines minimum standards and requirements for all companies, contractors, auction floors and growers, regardless of crop type.
Strengthening legal, policy and institutional frameworks for addressing child labour in Zimbabwe - Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare 2022 report
 
About Better Cotton
Better Cotton is a global not-for-profit organisation supporting the production of more equitable and sustainable cotton at farm level. We exist to catalyse the cotton farming community with partners, governments and others to continuously drive positive impact by setting standards and facilitating the supply and demand of more sustainable cotton from farm to brand.
In just 15 years we have aligned more than a fifth of the world’s cotton with our standard and helped farmers and farming communities thrive.
Read about Better Cotton’s approach to Decent Work here: How Better Cotton promotes decent working conditions around the world

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and the Business & Human Rights Resource Center

Climate change is both a growing catastrophe and an enormous opportunity for the world. It requires a rapid, global energy transition. The speed of the shift will depend on the scale and scope of investment available. But it will also depend on building broad public support, and particularly from those directly affected by renewable mega-projects and the vast new transition mineral operations essential to powering them. Replicating abuses of the traditional extractive sector risks further entrenching power inequalities between workers and frontline communities – many of which are Indigenous Peoples – and companies, threatening the transition as a whole, as rightsholders increasingly reject abuse and unfair terms.
A smart mix of measures – national, international, voluntary and mandatory – can mitigate these risks and provide pathways to a just energy transition grounded in a corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and commitment by business, investors, and governments to true shared prosperity. The mix includes:

• New regulatory advancements and guidelines demanding human rights due diligence and increased corporate accountability from regions as diverse as Latin America, Asia, and the EU.
• A limited – but growing – set of examples of better business and investor practice reflecting commitment to an equitable, sustainable and inclusive transition that respects rights and prioritises shared benefits.
• The informed and assertive role of trade unions, workers’ organisations and Indigenous Peoples’ organisations and communities to achieve fair outcomes to negotiations.

The discussion will seek to highlight the smart mix strategies necessary to deliver a fast and fair transition and a new social contract.

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and the Human Rights Entrepreneurs Clinic, Harvard Law School

This snapshot session will explore the content and application of the “Fourth Pillar,” an initiative which aims to center communities in the field of BHR. Despite the growth in the BHR field in recent years, communities are still too often missing from key conversations and decisions. Communities should be able to claim their place at the table, as they have first-hand understanding of what threatens their rights and have much to contribute to frameworks, processes, and practices that would better protect them. The Fourth Pillar Principles include the need to elevate community agency and tackle power imbalances that undermine communities’ rights. The Fourth Pillar Initiative seeks to have the Principles spur further action and innovation in the BHR field, adding to the “smart mix of measures” for businesses, states, civil society, and communities.

A full version of the Fourth Pillar Principles can be found at www.fourthpillarinitiative.com.

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and Global Compact Network Japan 

In Japan, collaboration between corporations and civil society through dialogue has been slow to progress. Various factors contribute to this, including a cultural tendency to avoid risk and external criticism, the absence of legal requirements for human rights due diligence that includes stakeholder engagement, and a tendency to focus on short-term goals even in areas like "business and human rights," which sometimes require a long-term perspective. As a result, there is little understanding within Japanese society of the role of civil society organizations, and the concept of stakeholder engagement itself is not well understood.
In this session, Mr. Orihashi, Manager of the Sustainability Department at Fast Retailing, which operates globally, will share insights on challenges and responses based on his experience of actively engaging with stakeholders over the past few years.
GCNJ is working within the United Nations Global Compact, together with each country network, to raise awareness about the importance of stakeholder engagement for businesses. Mr. Wakabayashi, Board member of GCNJ will discuss the importance of meaningful stakeholder engagement from business and a civil society perspective. He will delve into why promoting meaningful stakeholder engagement is crucial and explore effective approaches to achieving this.

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and the OGEES Institute

The intersection of business activities and human rights presents a critical area for scholarly exploration and policy development. Recognizing the importance of promoting responsible business practices, protecting human rights, and fostering expertise in this field, this panel aims to establish a multisectoral platform for advancing Business and Human Rights (BHRs) education and capacity development. Furthermore, bolstering the capacity for implementing BHRs scholarship and education necessitates educational institutions to develop customized courses that offer practical, skill-based learning utilizing a diverse array of online and traditional classroom resources. Conventional human rights programs typically lack the depth required to delve into the complexities of BHRs as a unique and interdisciplinary field of study. Thus, what are the BHRs education needs of stakeholders in business, government, civil society and industry associations, and how can educators effectively meet such needs through innovative pedagogy that emphasize the smart mix of measures?

Snapshot co-organized by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights and Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

The “Litigating Business & Human Rights” snapshot will feature an engaging and dynamic conversation between Deborah Enix-Ross, Senior Advisor for Global Engagement at Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, and past-President of the American Bar Association, and Daisuke Takahashi, Partner at Shinwa Law, Co-Chair of the International Bar Association’s Business & Human Rights Committee, and Representative Director of the Japan Center for Engagement and Remedy on Business and Human Rights. Deborah and Daisuke will discuss the role of litigation in the “smart mix” of judicial and non-judicial mechanisms in the enforcement of business and human rights. Speakers will focus on the advantages and limitations of litigation, the challenges of achieving meaningful remedy, the function of lawyers in business and human rights litigation, and the role of the UNGPs and the draft treaty in litigating business and human rights.

In the past decade, the UNGPs became the authoritative framework in the world of sport, in particular for organizing and staging mega-sporting events (MSEs), like the Olympic and Paralympic Games, or world or regional championships of a specific sport. A smart mix of human rights policies, requirements and provisions in hosting regulations and contracts, and human rights strategies, working groups, advisory boards, and guidances are currently in place, issued by sports bodies, governments and international organizations.

While there has been a strong increase in human rights standards, the information on the way these standards are being enforced is just emerging. This snapshot session reflects on the effectiveness of human rights due diligence measures that were implemented for UEFA’s EURO 2024 that took place in Germany in the summer of this year, with a specific focus on the Human Rights Advisory Board and grievance mechanism that UEFA and the event organizers established. A conversation between members of the board and representatives of UEFA will highlight some of the challenges and lessons learned regarding human rights due diligence for mega-sporting events.